Malpractice is any action compromising the integrity of assessment processes or outcomes. This could range from deliberate cheating by learners to more systemic issues, such as a centre failing to adhere to principles of assessment.
Other malpractice examples include falsifying learner records to unfair assessment practices, inflating grades, and unauthorised assistance during examinations. Another example involves misleading marketing tactics such as exaggerating course outcomes or employing deceptive advertising strategies to entice prospective learners. Malpractice can also appear when quality assurance teams fail to monitor and maintain all standards agreed upon as part of centre recognition.
Malpractice undermines learners, educators, and employers’ trust in training and qualifications. Imagine a scenario where an educational provider overlooks instances of plagiarism or even encourages shortcuts in assessment preparation. Such actions devalue diligent learners’ hard work and cast a shadow over the centre’s credibility. This misguides learners and tarnishes the reputation of legitimate institutions striving for transparency. Malpractice also opens avenues for unethical practice, resulting in qualifications that do not truly reflect a learner’s capabilities. It is vital to safeguard the reputation of training and qualifications to ensure that qualifications remain respected and valued within local, national and international contexts.
Addressing malpractice requires vigilance and adherence to best practices where internal and external quality assurance is required. Centres must have policies and procedures and report instances of potential breaches and malpractice. Awarding bodies must carry out regular audits to ensure all conditions of centre recognition are maintained. Addressing malpractice is not merely about compliance; it is about merit, authenticity and facilitating education that is trusted.